星期三, 6月 27, 2007

道德淪亡

不知道讀者就讀中二時過着怎樣的生活。

馬沙雖不愛讀書,但初中時代,生活算十分健康。記得當時,每朝在上課時間早一個小時,定必回校跟同學打排球。每天晚飯後,必到球場踢足球。一周又有3天放學後到足球場練波,當時心裡目標只有一個,就是能夠穿上17歲以下青年軍的球衣,踏進政府大球場作賽。馬沙的心願終於在中四那年完成,與南華會預備組作賽,賽事還編在甲組賽事頭場,觀眾都有過千。

昨天閱報,有兩則新聞令馬沙非常震驚,兩則均涉及就讀中二及中三的學生。

第一則是頭版新聞,新聞標題為「1女4男中二學生玩5P」。究竟甚麼是5P,即集體性行為也。如非昨天新聞大幅報道,馬沙相信大部分家長可能不知5P為何物。理由很簡單,集體性行為根本已經超出一般人可接受範圍,更遑論從日常生活中討論。事件中各人只有14至17歲,竟做出如此連成年人都不能接受的事情,相信現今青少年,真的已被互聯網上的色情資訊荼毒,情況確值得關注。

而另一則新聞關於四名中二及中三學生購買毒品參加派對。13歲就開始吸毒,下半生怎麼過呢? 據報道,有探員表示天水圍大把學生索K,仲寫埋Blog。

如此道德淪亡,政府、教育界及家長還不想想辦法,香港的未來,馬沙真不敢想像。

(6月27日刊於《am730》)

22 則留言:

Kenny 說...

我的童年完來咁苦悶…

堅堅 說...

原來讀男女校係咁好咖,大個仔除了幼稚園之外,一生人都未遇過女同學呢樣野.

匿名 說...

中 二 學 生 玩 5P
This girl is so sex hungry.
How about 中 3 & 中 4 ?
When 中 5 need upgrade to 10P ?

Siusiu 說...

現實生活中發生件咁o既事,話時話,好嘔心!即使睇日本3、4仔,類似的片種都一定飛走!百鳥歸巢仲要隻隻留低d野先走,諗起都好恐怖!

條女都short short地,無條件做公廁咁戇居都得,睇怕佢平時都慣左俾d所謂"朋友"輪大米!

狙擊型渣古 說...

如果我係個女仔的老豆, 我諗想自殺的係我而唔係個女囉
個女仔仲好意思要脅老豆唔好報警唔係就自殺
呢d人, 請快點自盡, 免得日後又玩5P, 跟住唔識避孕, 然後生左個細路仲要唔知邊個係經手人然後唔識教害左個小朋友

丁蟹 說...

點解我唔係生於呢個年代? >_< 

Carmen 說...

馬沙兄,

"如此道德淪亡,政府、教育界及家長還不想想辦法,香港的未來,馬沙真不敢想像。"

昨天看到此新聞, 真是嚇一嚇! 你說得對, 大家都有責任,"社會的錯、教育的錯和家庭的錯"....唉!

匿名 說...

唉...睇完呢單新聞,只令我覺得而家D細路好惡攪,我就唔識教,點敢生仔...

不敗的魔術師 說...

好明顯,馬沙你地呢種想法,正正係社會上「一元性論述」既代表,點解性開放既觀念要受到批判?同好多個男仔發生關係就等於唔愛惜自己身體?

性解放既先鋒如中大學生報等,好應該批判下呢種思維,支持下呢班小朋友,因為佢地係打破「一元性論述」既實行者,身體力行,以一敵四,埋身肉搏,唔係得把口架!而情色資訊正正可以拓闊我地呢班新一代既眼光,佢地睇既情色光碟就係一例.

學生報仲可以考慮去質疑點解和未成年少女發生性行為就算犯法?人地係自願架喎!是否侵犯其「性愛自由」?呢d權威,點可以唔挑戰!

匿名 說...

呢個姐姐仔家庭一定有D問題,請社工留心。

匿名 說...

i dont know why it is so suprising...
as far as all the people are volunteer to do so, no one have the right to say bad any of them...

wht matter most is just sex can give birth to live...why adult can treat sex as game, but y not the child?

as far as no one is forced to do so, it has no harm to anyone (provided that they have done sufficient safety measure)....

why the community cannot admit that there are some people thirsty for for sex ? why it cannot be a kind of interest? just like many people nowadays are enthusiastic for NDS, PC game!

C.M. 說...

Anonymous at 10:41,

>>why the community cannot admit...

The community does admit, BUT, in condition that "those cannot protect themselves should be protected."

"Those cannot protect themselves" may include:

1. those who cannot identify what is voluntary and what is NOT;
2. those who FEAR to say they are involuntary;
3. those who cannot identify what is physiologically unfit to stand against "harm".

"Age and gender" are set as "benchmarks" for these conditions.

菲菲 說...

自願仲可佈,我反而想知佢點解會自願。係好奇丫?刺激丫?定係其他?

不過咩原因都好,呢件事賁在令人痛心,太唔珍惜自己勒…

安諾勿斯 說...

cm兄講得好!

時下d年青人早熟,但早熟不代表不需要受保護。雖然我覺得以性別作基準已是過時,但以年齡來作心智指標o係哩一刻都可以放諸四海。小弟唔係一個衛道之士,真係唔mind成年人玩group sex,但我都係覺得過o左十八歲先「性解放」都唔遲。

不敗的魔術師 說...

C.M.

在某程度上來說,「自由主義」等於「放任主義」,可以好恐怖的.

住家男人 說...

以香港的低能法律,相信结果是悲惨的。尤其是果几个男仔,分分钟被人食左只猪之后,仲要受刑!

greatsoup 說...

請深入一點看問題,我覺得匿名講東西有道理,肯定家長因生計無法理會兒女,致使該事情出現?大家有沒有發覺有一點奇怪
為甚麼她媽媽不在家,要等父親回來才發現?
性早熟不是問題,最緊要是不是有適當的性教育。

匿名 說...

Having sex with a gal of age 15 is illegal, but after her b day is acceptable by law.....


I did not see any reason for the same person just after one day, she can become more knowledgeable, mature enough to have sex?

匿名 說...

Parents are busy to earn a living and they do not have time to take care their children. Teachers in school can only have time to provide knowledge. Children are too easy to get information from internet or from peers and they cannot identify what is correct or not. They just do it by their feeling and this is very dangerous.

C.M. 說...

To: Anonymous at 12:01,

>>but after her b day is acceptable by law.....

That's why age is set as a "benchmark" only. Law cannot identify what who have enough "knowledge/maturity", nor can anyone have any. Some laws just needs a cut-off line.

You may still not matter if 1-minute late back to office may not turn the business upside down, but still, there's a "start time" for your office hours.

To: greatsoup and Anonymous at 4:36

You both are right.

方潤 說...

好似不敗的魔術師提到﹕
> 學生報仲可以考慮去質疑點解和未成年少女發生性行為就算犯法?人地係自願架喎!是否侵犯其「性愛自由」?呢d權威,點可以唔挑戰!

乜真係冇人挑戰咩﹖吳敏倫都鬧左好多年啦。大家只想聽到自己鍾意既說話o者。
點解呢單野淨係告男生﹖因為法律只罰男性,就算雙方同樣未成年,也是一樣。
這就是傳統社會認為「性是男賺女蝕」的荒謬看法在法律上的體現。所以有「與未成年少女發生性行為罪」(與未成年男性就冇罪﹖)、強姦罪只有男強姦女(冇女強姦男)。
(當然,從生理上而言,女性的確有一點「蝕」—就是懷孕。但很明顯「性」對於人類的意義,遠遠超乎生育以外。否則世上不會有痴女/女色狼。)

> 在某程度上來說,「自由主義」等於「放任主義」,可以好恐怖的.

在某程度上來說,「民主普選、三權分立」等於「港獨」,可以好恐怖的。
我真的相信,中央果班友係咁諗。
如果你覺得中央咁諗好荒謬,咁將自由等同放任,也一樣荒謬。

當然,這說不等於我支持班細路咁玩法,我好懷疑佢地究竟有冇諗清楚。佢地點樣睇「性/身體」,亦似乎跟我們相差很遠。
但係我支持將呢D野拎出黎講,點解多P唔可以講﹖點解要將「不道德」當成禁忌﹖
唔通你地以為禁絕色情片、唔俾細路睇,就可以避免呢D事﹖
我寧願就好似中大學生報咁,攤開黎講好過。

如果呢D野唔係禁忌,可以攤開黎講,我地先會知道原來有D細路想咁做。如此我地先可以對症下藥,了解佢地點解想(好奇﹖寂寞﹖定其他原因﹖),同教佢地諗多一點、諗長遠一點。
只有我地可以教到小朋友三思而後行,先可以避免更多的不幸(無論是濫交、暴力或毒品),這不是「把問題當成禁忌」可以解決的。

(當然,中大學生報自己做得唔好,又要強辭辯駁,這是另一回事。但情色版絕對說不上不雅,更不應該被禁,這是我的堅決立場。)

匿名 說...

Hihi